Santa Clara Partition Attorney

Partition Lawyers in Santa Clara

Our Santa Clara partition litigation attorneys will work diligently to obtain a favorable outcome on your behalf, whether by negotiation or litigation. 

Talkov Law’s attorneys serving Santa Clara County are exceptionally experienced in the area of California partition actions. A California partition action is a law that allows co-owners of real property to divide the property among themselves. The partition statutes provide a legal mechanism for co-owners to divide the property without having to go through the court system. The partition statutes allow co-owners to divide the property either by agreement or by court order. If the co-owners cannot agree on how to divide the property, then the court will divide the property in a way that is fair and equitable to all parties. The partition statutes also provide that any partition of the property must be in accordance with the laws of the state of California. The legal effect of the partition statutes is that it provides a legal mechanism for co-owners to divide their property without having to go through the court system.

For a free consultation with California’s first and largest team of partition attorneys at Talkov Law at (408) 777-6800 or contact us online today.

Call us at (408) 777-6800 or contact us below to schedule a free, 15-minute consultation.

Elbert, Limited v. Federated Income Properties - Partition Action Case Study

In the legal case of Elbert, Limited v. Federated Income Properties, 120 Cal.App.2d 194 (1953), the issue of partition was at the center of the dispute. The case involved a dispute between two parties over the ownership of a parcel of real estate. Elbert, Limited, the plaintiff, argued that it was the rightful owner of the property, while Federated Income Properties, the defendant, argued that it was the rightful owner. The court had to determine which party had the right to the property. The court found that the property had been partitioned between the two parties, with Elbert, Limited receiving the larger portion. However, the court also found that the partition was not valid, as it had not been done in accordance with the law. The court ruled that the partition was invalid and that the property should be divided equally between the two parties.