Partition Lawyers in Sacramento
Our Sacramento partition litigation attorneys will work diligently to obtain a favorable outcome on your behalf, whether by negotiation or litigation.
Talkov Law’s attorneys serving Sacramento County are exceptionally experienced in the area of California partition actions. California partition actions provide a legal mechanism for co-owners of real property to divide the property among themselves. The partition statutes allow a co-owner to file a lawsuit in court to have the property divided, either physically or by sale. The court will then order the division of the property in a way that is fair and equitable to all parties. The partition statutes also provide that any proceeds from the sale of the property must be divided among the co-owners in proportion to their respective interests in the property.
- How long does a partition action take in California?" Most partition actions are complete in 3 to 6 months because most cases settle in either a buyout or agreed sale. However, some cases can drag on for 6 to 12 months.
- Can a minority owner force the sale of a property? There is no requirement for a majority vote for partition. Rather, an co-owner of any interest in property can force the sale.
- Can a partition action be stopped? Generally, a partition action cannot be stopped, but a defendant may be able to buy time to seek a resolution. Eventually, however, the plaintiff can generally force the sale of the property based on the absolute right to partition.
- What types of properties can be subject to a partition action in California? All co-owned real or personal property can be partitioned under California law. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 872.020.
- Can we negotiate a settlement instead of going through a partition action? We find that the best solution is to file the partition action, then negotiate a settlement. Defendants often reach a more reasonable settlement when they are being advised by a partition attorney who will explain that the plaintiff is very likely to obtain the sale of the property.
For a free consultation with California’s first and largest team of partition attorneys at Talkov Law at (916) 668-3300 or contact us online today.
Call us at (916) 668-3300 or contact us below to schedule a free, 15-minute consultation.
Bartlett v. Mackey - Partition Action Case Study
In the legal case of Bartlett v. Mackey, 130 Cal. 181 (1900), the California Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a partition of real property was valid. The dispute arose when two brothers, William and John Mackey, inherited a parcel of land from their father. William wanted to keep the land intact, while John wanted to divide it into two separate parcels. The court held that the partition was valid, but that William was entitled to compensation for the value of the land he was giving up. The court also held that the partition should be made in such a way that each brother would receive an equal share of the land. The court's decision established the principle that when two or more people own real property, they can divide it into separate parcels, but that the division must be made in a fair and equitable manner.