Mountain View Partition Attorney

Partition Lawyers in Mountain View

Our Mountain View partition litigation attorneys will work diligently to obtain a favorable outcome on your behalf, whether by negotiation or litigation. 

Talkov Law’s attorneys serving Santa Clara County are exceptionally experienced in the area of California partition actions. California partition actions provide a legal mechanism for co-owners of real property to divide the property among themselves. The partition statutes allow a co-owner to file a lawsuit in court to have the property divided, either physically or by awarding each co-owner a certain percentage of the property's value. The court will then order the property to be divided according to the co-owners' wishes. The partition statutes also provide that if the court finds that a physical division of the property is not possible, it may order the property to be sold and the proceeds divided among the co-owners.

  • Are there methods to resolve a partition situation without a court-ordered sale? The vast majority of partitions are solved without a court-ordered sale. Many times, the defendant will buy out the plaintiff's interest. Other times, the parties will agree to a voluntary sale on the open market. However, the filing of the partition action is generally what forces the defendant to see the wisdom of settlement. Under California's Partition of Real Property Act, a defendant can buy out the interest of the plaintiff at an appraised value, meaning that a court-ordered sale is only likely occur where the defendant simply can't afford to buy the property but still won't agree to sell.
  • What is a partition action and when is it necessary?
  • How much does a partition action cost? The cost of a partition action can vary widely depending on the complexity of the case. A typical partition action usually costs between $5,000 and $12,000, with about $8,000 being the most common cost. However, difficulty locating a defendant, the motion to appoint a partition referee, delay tactics by defendants, and other issues may raise the cost of your partition action. An experienced partition lawyer can mitigate costs and resolve your co-ownership dispute with maximum efficiency.
  • When is a partition action right for my dispute? Generally, parties who can reach their own resolution of a co-ownership dispute are not reading websites about partition law. If you are reading this article, chances are that your co-ownership dispute has reached a level where legal options are being considered. Filing a partition action will bring about a certain result to the co-ownership dispute, rather than letting it linger for years on end. However, if the parties are very close to a settlement, it may be wise to consider a resolution.
  • How will the property be divided if a partition action is successful? In most partition actions, the property will be sold, rather than being divided. If the property is eligible for partition in-kind, the court can appoint a referee to prepare a report on dividing the property in a manner that does not damage the value of the fractional interests.

For a free consultation with California’s first and largest team of partition attorneys at Talkov Law at (650) 999-3300 or contact us online today.

Call us at (650) 999-3300 or contact us below to schedule a free, 15-minute consultation.

In re Knox' Estate - Partition Action Case Study

In the legal case of In re Knox' Estate, 52 Cal.App.2d 338 (1942), is a legal case that deals with the issue of partition of property. The case involved a dispute between two siblings, Mary and William Knox, over the partition of their father's estate. Mary claimed that she was entitled to a one-half interest in the estate, while William argued that he was entitled to the entire estate. The court found that Mary was entitled to a one-half interest in the estate, and ordered a partition of the estate. The court also held that Mary was entitled to a one-half interest in the proceeds of the sale of the estate, and that William was entitled to the other one-half. The court also held that Mary was entitled to a one-half interest in the rents and profits of the estate, and that William was entitled to the other one-half. The court also ordered that the partition be made in accordance with the laws of the state of California.